Defy this

March 10, 2010

Wilde (1997)

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 5:28 pm

If anybody was born to play Oscar Wilde, it necessity tease been Stephen Fry: not lone does he look like the Green Carnation Male, but he himself is often portrayed as being too clever, too complex for his own good. Gilbert’s videotape, with an intelligent screenplay by Julian Mitchell based on Richard Ellmann’s biography, looks curiously long-standing-fashioned. More spend than Merchant Ivory, it’s a ’60s-characterize Technicolor affair with a grown-up ’90s have compassion for incline. Unlike its predecessors, it’s able to be on the level about the sexual encounters: with staunch co-worker Robbie Ross; with rent boys to whom Wilde was indulgently generous; and, fatefully, with the love of his energy, the beautiful, wilful, spoilt brat Pull rank Alfred (’Bosie’) Douglas, who didn’t fancy Wilde, but saw him as the alternative father to his brutal, bullying pater, the Marquess of Queensberry. As Wilde, descending from would-be-doting store and framer to student of his own ‘nature’, and absolutely ruined and disgraced martyr on the tree of English hypocrisy, Fry is properly convincing. He speaks the witty lines as if he invented them and manages to square Wilde’s weakness and arrogance with his immense generosity of pneuma, while his prison stall reunion with sinking wife Constance (Ehle) would turn a above warden battle-cry. The company oozes real class: Redgrave is superb as Wilde’s tigerish Irish ma; Wilkinson suitably disgusting as Queensberry; Sheen precise as Ross; and Law explosively arresting as the capricious, finally destructive Douglas.

Download Aliens in the Attic Movie blu ray

March 8, 2010

Perfectly suitable for prime-…

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 4:18 pm

Superlatively applicable for prime-for the nonce at once location on any relatives-skewing line network, “Paradise, Texas” is a pleasant but in the cards play about a fading effect actor who tries to reunite with his people — and reignite his stalled career — by starring in an indie drama being shot on unearthing in the small Texas hamlet of his birth. Solid cast of familiar faces and promising newcomers provides emotional heft throughout the bromide-riddled routine, and first-class production values help make the unassuming pic modestly diverting.

Timothy Bottoms is effectively low-key as Mack Cameron, an thesp whose stock has fallen significantly since he played the lead in “the third highest-grossing movie of 1986.” Still widely recognized and besieged for autographs, Cameron nonetheless finds himself phoning his agent with ever-increasing desperation.

Trouble is, he finds work just often enough to keep him away too long, too often, from his young sons (Dylan Michael Patton, Emilio Mazur) and his increasingly unsympathetic wife (Meredith Baxter).

Mack hopes to improve both his personal and professional lives when he opts to star in an indie pic before taking a supporting turn in a Hollywood blockbuster. With his family in tow, he returns to his roots in homespun Littleton, Texas, just down the road from the long-shuttered Paradise Drive-In theater that his father used to operate. (”Paradise, Texas” may be the only pic in which a character waxes nostalgic for the 1962 remake of “Mutiny on the Bounty.”)

At first, production goes smoothly, and the family re-bonds eagerly. In addition, Mack graciously mentors his adolescent co-star, CJ Kinney (Ben Estus), a local farm boy whose talent for dancing has heretofore displeased his disapproving father. (Think of “Billy Elliott, Texas Style.”)

But when Mack finds the impatient producers of the Hollywood blockbuster have cast someone else in his role, the actor almost immediately degenerates into a boozy and embittered lout who alienates his family and endangers CJ. It takes a brush with tragedy, a stroll down Memory Lane, and a well-placed sock in the jaw to make the self-indulgent thesp see the error of his ways.

Director Lorraine Senna emphasizes local color — pic was shot near Houston — while artfully maneuvering around obvious budgetary restraints. Well-cast supporting players, including Polly Bergen as Mack’s feisty publicist mom and Sheryl Lee as CJ’s supportive mother, add welcome shadings of color to thinly written parts. Newcomer Estes makes an engaging impression, though his dance sequences are shot and edited in such a fragmented style as to suggest that — well, maybe dancing really isn’t his forte.

March 7, 2010

Poster: B-; C+ Review: A very…

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 11:33 am

  • Poster:

    B-; C+

Review:

A very simple poster that will easily turn off the kinds of viewers who shouldn't see the film. It doesn't conjure up horrific images of subdermal infestation, which seems perfect for the film.

The second poster is a lot less creepy and a lot less interesting. It's quite different and might be a little more enticing to some.


  • Trailer:

    B; C+

Review:

Psychological thriller or Grade F horror schlock? The preview suggests the latter, but William Friedkin knows how to twist a tale making this the most likely of this year's horror crop to be frightful and thought provoking.; It doesn't look like much new was added except a journo mention. At least you can tell that it's going to be a film filled with gory images, so at least you can prepare yourself. It's still difficult to tell if the bugs are entirely psychological or real. At least that adds some suspense to the project.

Oscar Prospects:

Unlikely to catch fire like Friedkin's Oscar success

The Exorcist

, I doubt this film will even make a blip on the Oscar radar.

Release Date:

  • May 25, 2007

Full Review Synopsis:

I have not seen this film.

  • ©1996-2010 - Written content and Logos are copyrighted by Wesley Lovell
  • © ® ™ Academy Award(s), Oscar(s) and the Oscar statuette are registered trademarks and service marks of

    A.M.P.A.S.
  • © Film images are copyrighted by the individual studios

March 4, 2010

The deepest virtues of “Coral…

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 7:03 pm

The deepest virtues of “Coraline” are dark. This seemingly innocuous 3-D animation presents a grim vision of the modern family - as something to escape from - and shows the imagination as something too terrifying and self-consuming to offer refuge. That the movie does all this from within the confines of the children’s-film genre makes it all the more eerie and unconsciously evocative.

What a shrewd achievement for writer-director Henry Selick (”The Nightmare Before Christmas”), to have made a movie that everyone will acclaim as beautiful, when perhaps the most beautiful thing about it is the sheer ugliness of it all.

Coraline is an 11-year-old girl, newly moved into a big old house with her parents, who both write about gardening, even though they’re both so busy writing that they have no time to do any digging. Coraline is a querulous child, about as adorable as a skin rash, bossy with friends and demanding with her parents. Dakota Fanning voices Coraline and makes her even more unpleasant than the script demands. The idea of little girls throughout America actually identifying with this animated character is perhaps the scariest thing about the movie.

Download Terminator Salvation Movie in Best quality

We soon find that Coraline got her charm from Mom and Dad. Mom (Teri Hatcher) is sarcastic and unloving, without a kind word for anyone, and Dad (John Hodgman) is downright creepy, one of those guys - we all know one - who halfheartedly pretends that his detachment is a form of wry affability. It’s not. And so Coraline has a mother who isn’t there and a father who has checked out long ago. Both are buried in work. This is a portrait of the American family that many children will recognize, much to the embarrassment of their parents.

Coraline longs for something better, and one day, after she has gone to bed, she is awakened by a mouse, which leads her to a small door that takes her out of her own house into another house. This house is an idealized version of her present reality: Instead of dreary, the house is colorful. The parents there are idealized versions of her own parents, in that they’re loving and kind and make delicious dinners every night. There’s one point of peculiarity, however: These alternative parents have buttons in place of their eyes, like old-fashioned dolls. This produces an unsettling affect.

Indeed, even before the story tips its hand, something in the smiling unreality of these images suggests that something isn’t right about Coraline’s idealized world. Based on Neil Gaiman’s book, this is “Alice in Wonderland” or “Alice Through the Looking Glass” all over again, a metaphorical tour through the contours of the unconscious, where the monsters are always hiding, either underneath the floorboards or right around the corner. This is the LSD trip right before the friendly people grow fangs and start laughing when you scream.

As a live-action film, “Coraline” would have been too literal and either too frightening or too absurd (or both). The stop-action animation allows the filmmakers to turn unconscious terror into pleasing pictures, thus enabling them to go further and deeper. By midway, “Coraline” reaches the point that it seems to be hinting at dimly repressed childhood nightmares. We watch with a sense of memory and vague, unsettled recognition. There’s something going on here, something true and odd and definitely not cheerful, and it gets under the skin.

Meanwhile, “Coraline” is gorgeous - gorgeous like a Venus flytrap: A marching band of mice jump around in a mouse theater. Plants bloom into three-dimensional life in a moonlit garden. By such diversions, the movie creates an aura of safety - and sneaks up on us, slowly. Its method is actually a metaphor for the story being told, in which the unconscious mind, using pretty symbols and diversions, goes on the attack.

In keeping with this underlying seriousness, the actors don’t camp it up. I particularly enjoyed the cat, as voiced by Keith David, who has narrated so many documentaries on the History Channel that I half expected the cat to say something about World War II. He doesn’t. The actors play it straight. They don’t try to be charming or ad lib wisecracks. They serve the director’s vision, and what a rich, strange vision it is.

– Advisory: May be frightening for younger children.

To hear Mick LaSalle talk about movies, listen to his weekly podcast at sfgate.com/podcasts.

E-mail Mick LaSalle at mlasalle@sfchronicle.com.

March 2, 2010

The Hills Have Eyes (2006)

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 5:53 pm
“A slick updated nasty version
of Wes Craven’s grisly pop-cult grade-B horror flick of 1977.”

Download Aliens in the Attic Movie hd

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

A slick updated nasty version of Wes Craven’s grisly pop-cult grade-B
horror flick of 1977 “The Hills Have Eyes.” It’s an over-the-top gore-fest
message movie about America in denial about its misconduct during its cold
war nuclear testing program and in a more circumvent way its failed policy
in its current War on Terrorism. The message delivered as a metaphor is
on the money, but that doesn’t mean it always transfers well into a horror
movie (there’s an overkill in brutality and a lack of novelty that only
ramps up the set pieces from the original but does little else to improve
it). The French writer-director Alexandre Aja (”High Tension”) and co-writer
Grégory Levasseur keep the shocking narrative similar to the original
which was meant to be scary stuff, but it’s now supported with a big budget
and manages to get the monsters better makeup (the original makeup was
cheesy and more laughable than scary) and improve on the special effects
while making the narrative more topical, political and graphic.

The all-American faith-based vacationing Carter family leave Cleveland
for San Diego on their RV trip, and get off the beaten path to look at
the desert of New Mexico (filmed in Morocco). Given a short-cut to get
back on the highway by a creepy hillbilly gas attendant (Tom Bower), one
not listed on the map, Big Bob (Ted Levine), the Carter family patriarch,
conservative and ex-Cleveland detective who now runs a private security
firm, finds on this desolate desert detour they are far from help when
their vehicle breaks an axle. Stuck in the sweltering desert sun the starchy
matriarch Ethel (Kathleen Quinlan) leads the family in prayer and then
Big Bob’s “weasel” Democrat son-in-law, Doug Bukowski (Aaron Stanford),
a cell phone salesman, goes in one direction for help, while Big Bob walks
the 8 miles back to the run-down gas station (the cell phone gets no signal).
The spoiled teen daughter Brenda (Emilie de Ravin) suns herself, while
her impressionable younger teenage brother Bobby (Dan Byrd) runs after
Beauty, one of the family’s two German shepherd’s, with the other named
Beast. Beauty senses there’s someone in the nearby hills, and Bobby finds
Beauty dead and gutted. But when Bobby returns to the campsite, he keeps
it to himself because he doesn’t want to alarm the others. Older sister
Lynne Bukowski (Vinessa Shaw) is nursing baby Catherine, and chatting with
grumpy Brenda, who would rather be in Cancun, about how to make the best
of the disappointing family outing. 

Soon the bickering so-called normal nuclear family is targeted for
violence by another nuclear family–a mining family who are victims of
the nuclear testing program conducted in the area from the 1940s to 1950s
when they refused to move, and are now pictured as a pack of amoral and
deformed flesh-eating mutants that have colorful names such as Papa Jupiter
(Billy Drago), Lizard (Robert Joy), and Big Brain (Desmond Askew). The
blood-splatter includes: rape, pickaxe murders, an immolation, cannibalism,
dismemberment, a gun pointed at an abducted baby’s head and various other
unpleasantries. That the victims fight back as the dorky Democrat becomes
an action-hero that even the Republican right-wingers can identify with,
is meant to show that in order to survive in such a terror-filled world
the innocents have to turn as savage as their enemies. But the more advanced
message in the remake uses the silent majority family to make a more potent
political statement about the world’s richest Christian country as a warmongering
country who forces its form of democracy on a country with a different
culture and how this country is left twisting in the wind because its faith-based
beliefs don’t match the country’s corporate ways, where after praying the
same religious people are caught not living fully as Christians but going
after unbridled wealth and power through military might. This might be
reading too much in a pic meant only as a commercial film but, nevertheless,
in all the retro sleaze and lack of subtleties in its splatter there was
at least an attempt to say something relevant about each archetypal family
depicted (the haves and the have-nots), as a foreigner tells his American
audience why the world now hates you as only an outsider can do when most
Americans are still unable to see that they’ve been had by an incompetent
and incurious administration of neocons.

March 1, 2010

" ‘Happy Endings’ restor…

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 2:13 am

" ‘Happy Endings’ restores your faith in the genre," somebody says on the Internet. Which genre would that be? Oh, that genre: the gay mixed-up couple’s lawsuit over semen misuse / quasi-incest / irresponsible documentary filmmaker / restaurant genre. God, no, not another one of those!

Actually, what’s so splendid about "Happy Endings" is the very fact that it fits into no genre whatsoever and at no time while watching it can you say, oh, probably this is going to happen. That’s because "this" never happens. Instead "that" always happens.


Bobby Cannavale and Lisa Kudrow, above, and Maggie Gyllenhaal and Tom Arnold, below, are some of the many, many players in the ensemble drama “Happy Endings.” (Photos By Eric Lee)

In fact, the worst thing about it might be the melancholy it inspires in critics who are professionally bound to sum it up. I hereby resign. I can’t sum it up. It’s got too many tendrils and filigrees. Let’s put it this way: Most movies are like an instant replay of pro football on TV. The camera focuses on a little patch of action. But professional coaches hate to watch football on TV because they don’t see enough. They’d much rather see snapshots taken from the rim of the stadium where the players are ants, because that way it all makes sense and you can see the relationships.

"Happy Endings," therefore, is like the coach’s snapshot from the rim of the stadium; you can see how everything is related. It begins with the most primitive of relationships: brother and sister, sort of.

Mamie and Charley, first glimpsed 18 years ago, are just that, but not really: They are thrown together in the same house when her mother marries his father in Los Angeles. Being 18, it doesn’t take them long to get beyond the handshake stage, and the consequences are what compel the film onward.

In grown-up time, Mamie turns out to be the most talented of the "Friends" tribe, Lisa Kudrow, and Charley is played by the British comedian and actor Steve Coogan. They are the two poles of the film, which watches as their orbits and their hangers-on intersect in unusual ways.

The writer-director Don Roos had a breakout indie feature seven years ago with "The Opposite of Sex," in which Christina Ricci played a deadpan, cynical loose cannon of a teenager who more or less blew up every world she rolled through, including her brother’s and her sister’s. That pattern is repeated in "Happy Endings," but this time Maggie Gyllenhaal plays the teen, a 19-year-old named Jude who comes into the movie by way of a third mixed-up family situation, whose distance from the Charley-Mamie axis is baffling for the longest time (it comes together in the end).

Jude is a kind of drifter, a marginal figure, who happens to sing at a bar’s open-mike night and is asked by the backup band to join up, as they’ve just lost their singer. She does — what the hell, it’s not as if she were going to go to law school, and quickly enough she’s linked to Otis (Jason Ritter), the band’s drummer and impresario and financier. He’s all those things because his dad (Tom Arnold) is rich. He’s also gay but doesn’t want his dad to know it, so he asks Jude to move in with him — it’s a very, very nice house — and soon Dad himself, a widower, is paying attention to Jude, and Jude knows a good thing when she sees it.

That’s kind of the movie in a nutshell: It’s about people who use people in the most exploitative of ways, but at the same time like their victims immensely. You might say the subject proper of the film is the inappropriate emotions that are released during dangerous transactions.

Download District 9 Full Movie blu ray

Meanwhile — this is a movie where the word "meanwhile" must be used abundantly — Mamie has her problems. An ambitious young filmmaker named Nicky (Jesse Bradford) has found out about a lost child in her past and wants to use the reunion of the two as the subject of a documentary that will get him an American Film Institute fellowship. He plans to blackmail her into acquiescence, because her feelings about the child are so intensely ambiguous. But then she talks him into switching the subject: Now Nicky will do a film about Mamie’s boyfriend Javier (Bobby Cannavale), a masseur whose magic fingers sometimes do more than simply relax by kneading and get into relaxing the needing.

Meanwhile No. 3: This subplot turns to Charley, who has turned out gay. With his partner Gil (David Sutcliffe), Charley is suing two lesbian friends (played by Laura Dern and Sarah Clarke) who may have used Gil’s sperm to produce the child they are raising, whom Charley yearns to have.

Are you lost yet? I was, during quite a bit of "Happy Endings," but it never grew tedious or painful, because I had faith that Roos would sort it out, and he did. Moreover, the acting in this ensemble is of such a high order that the movie simply takes you in and makes you feel these lives as real.

"Happy Endings" is about — well, it’s sort of about everything, while pretending to be about nothing.

Happy Endings (130 minutes, at area theaters) is rated R for sexual content, language and some drug use.

February 28, 2010

Maytime (1937)

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 1:18 am

Maytime has so multitudinous clear qualities that its length, infrequent lapses into the unneeded and betimes imperceptive interludes will be acceptable.

The vocal piece-de-resistance, of course, is the Sigmund Romberg waltz ballad, ‘Will You Remember?’ perhaps better known as ‘Sweetheart, Sweetheart’. This has been artfully backgrounded throughout the extended running time by Herbert Stothart.

The stars, Jeanette MacDonald and Nelson Eddy, are splendid in their vocal assignments. it’s chiefly MacDonald’s picture. She looks her best in the Napoleonic period costumes, and is charming in her make-up as the venerable old lady, with a slightly mysterious past, who finally opens up as she counsels the petulant Lynne Carver and Tom Brown on the wisdom of forsaking a career in favor of romance. Eddy carries through the worthy impression made by this pair in their past operetta successes. His robust baritone again nicely balances MacDonald’s soprano.

Histrionically there is also John Barrymore in a fat supporting assignment as a somewhat dour mentor of the ambitious prima donna.

The ‘Huguenots’ operatic sequence (Meyerbeer, scored by Stothart) is one of the major vocal highlights. ‘Czaritza’ is the original Stothart adaptation from Tchaikovsky’s Fifth Symphony into a new Russian opera, libretto by Bob Wright and Chet Forrest. This is the major operatic interlude and MacDonald, Eddy and the Don Cossacks make the most of it, singing the French lyrics by Gilles Guilbert.

The light brown sepia tinging, which Metro used in Good Earth (1936), is utilized in certain sequences, notably in the St Cloud carnival scene and the ‘Maytime’ - ‘Will You Remember?’ waltz finale.

1937: Nominations: Best Score, Sound

February 26, 2010

DVD (Region 1) Aspect Ratio: 1…

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 4:58 pm

DVD (Region 1)

Aspect Ratio: 1.75:1 (approx. Widescreen)

Audio: English (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround); English (Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono)

Features: Audio Commentary (by director Tope Hooper, director of photography Daniel Pearl and star Gunnar Hansen); Theatrical Trailers; TV Spots; Deleted Scenes & Alternate Footage; Blooper Reel; Trailers for “TCM 2, 3,4″; Still Photos Archives (Production Stills, Posters, etc.).

The Movie: 1974. Fresh out of film school, young director Tobe Hooper and his crew shoot a low-budget horror film on a lousy 16mm film stock and call it “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.” After its low-key release (and subsequent re-release), “TCM” went on to be hailed as a genre masterpiece –and more importantly, a blueprint of things to come (like 1978’s “Halloween” and 1980’s “Friday The 13th). Basic plotline is about 5 teens driving in their hippie van through Texas. They come upon a loony hitchhiker, weird gas station attendant and a creepy house in the middle of nowhere, where they are picked off (one-by-one) by the psychotic “Leatherface”– a human-skin mask/chainsaw-toting freak (who’s related to the other aformentioned loonies). One girl, Sally, makes it out of there in one piece. But Leatherface and cannibal company are still out there…waiting for their “dinner.”

District 9 video download bluray

The Picture: Pioneer Entertainment has done a good job transferring the 16mm print to this DVD (color corrections, HD transferring, the works). But let’s face it, the original print is full of scratches and looks pretty bad. But whaddaya expect for a 25-year old movie!

The Sound: Pioneer was also kind enough to remix the original mono soundtrack and give us a 2.0 Surround track. Thanx, folks! A chainsaw never sounded so eerie!

The Extras: Here is where the DVD excels. If you’re a “TCM” fan or even just a genre buff, then you’ll be in heaven with all of the goodies presented here. My only complaint is the lack of a 60-minute documentary that was put on the VHS and LD versions of “TCM” (if it was placed here, the I would’ve been verrry ecstatic!). The interactive menus are one of the best, too.

Conclusion: The “TCM” DVD should definitely be added to the shelves of horror buffs, as it is a strong testament to the ingenuity of low-budget filmmakers everywhere (your truly included). Happy chainsawing, y’all!

February 24, 2010

The Apostate review

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 8:53 pm

THE APOSTATE

Synopsis:

Richard Grieco plays a Jesuit priest whose brother while working as a prostitute, is murdered in the slums of San Juan Puerto Rico. Given the mutilation of the bodies and the use of their blood as “paint” if you will, Grieco identifies the murderer as a religious fanatic whose crimes will not only increase but also become more and more horrific. Dennis Hopper (skills totally wasted here) plays the psychopath and ham it up, he does. The Apostate had great promise of being a decent thriller however, Grieco’s inability to convey a believable character coupled with the numerous failings of the script, extremely poor acting from the balance of the cast and a film that for all intents and purposes had no point, doomed the movie from the opening credits.

Audio/Video:

The feature is presented in a DD2.0 platform that adequately presents the film’s aural material. The dialogue was, for the most part easily understood. However, the subs cleared up any and all questions where the dialogue was muddied to the point where it could not be understood. The effects of the score, rain effects and stingers coupled with dialogue made for difficult listening at times.
The visual portion of the feature is a full frame presentation that for the most part is pleasing to the eye. There are elements of pixellation and grain in the transfer that became evident in every one of the darker segments of the film.

Extras:

There are no extras on this disc.

Overall:

The Apostate stands out as a seriously sub-standard entry. Truthfully, I had forgotten all about Richard Grieco until I saw his name on the jacket of the disc. While Grieco was able to muster an incredible amount of emotional energy, he was not able to make his character real. The success of any film in the way of enjoyment/believability comes from the viewer being able to immerse him or herself in the world that’s been presented. The Apostate never really got any steam going in that direction and the end result is pretty awful.

Skip it

February 23, 2010

Highlander 3: The Final Dimension review

Filed under: Uncategorized — defythis @ 4:23 am


0


STARRING:

Christopher Lambert, Mario Van Peebles,
Deborah Unger, Mako, Raoul Trujillo, Martin Neufeld, Jean-Pierre
Perusse, Daniel Do, Gabriel Kakon, Michael Jayston
1994, 94 Minutes,

Directed by:

Andy Morahan


Sort:


The heroine Connor MacLeod (Christopher
Lambert — HIGHLANDER 1 & 2, FORTRESS) destined destined for a decisive fight with his
unrelenting eternal enemy, Kane (Mario Van Peebles — GUNMEN, POSSE, DIFFERENT JACK
CITY). Pursued across quickly by his arch rival, MacLeod must make a honourable last
stand if he is to rid the earth of the seemingly unstoppable Kane.

?


Amazon.com


They
definitely don't in any worse than this. This
second (and amazingly not the model form!) consequence to the original
Highlander
film over
ignores the events of the second glaze and video receiver series
in full and seems to be more of a remake of the original.
Without the configuration, of course.
Noisome
acting and tract holes good passably to fit the planet Jupiter in -
the same of them being the ancient Japanese warrior frozen in ice for
a few hundred years' perfect English and how they manage to
travel from Japan to New York within what must have been 15
minutes . . .

Highlander
- Endgame

was the model pompously screen

Highlander

sequel and was
inspired by the leading talkie and the TV series.


Read the

script

.


Click
here

to receive our set at liberty weekly e-mail newsletter.

Copyright © 1997-forward James O'Ehley/The Sci-Fi Big Call out (unless where indicated otherwise).

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress