Warning: include(/hermes/bosweb/web013/b134/d5.briggspage/public_html/swgtcg/topnav.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /hermes/bosweb/web013/b134/d5.briggspage/public_html/swgtcgblogs/wp-content/themes/default/header.php on line 40

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/hermes/bosweb/web013/b134/d5.briggspage/public_html/swgtcg/topnav.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php-5.2.12/lib/php') in /hermes/bosweb/web013/b134/d5.briggspage/public_html/swgtcgblogs/wp-content/themes/default/header.php on line 40




Archive for November, 2009

It sure makes an ugly mess. B…

Monday, November 30th, 2009

It sure makes an ugly mess. But, hey, it’s only a movie. It’s not
the end of the world.

We’ve already seen “Armageddon” recently, only it was called
“Deep Impact.” Same story, different style.

In both, humankind is threatened by an asteroid (or comet) on a
collision course with Earth, and the team sent into space to blow it
up apparently is doomed.

Bruce Willis plays the team leader, and it’s a crying shame what
happens to him. Willis becomes heavy-spirited and reverential.
Audiences love Willis for his sly humor and subversiveness; we do not
care to see him noble and mawkish.

The ground keeps shifting under our feet as director Michael Bay
runs through a number of styles. The thank-God-for-NASA! ending is a
180-degree reversal of the action-
farce tone at the beginning.
That tone is particularly ugly when ordinary people, for no reason
except a cheap laugh, are presented as buffoons. The amateur astrono
mer who discovers the deadly asteroid says, “I want to name her
Dixie, after my wife — she’s a vicious, life-sucking bitch.”

In the stupefying space-action sequences, barrages of fast cuts
distract us from the fact that the director is showing no real
action.

Ben Affleck is cast as the ingenue who is supposed to deliver
diffident humor. It’s sad to see a talented actor asked to play cute.

The Naked Dawn review

Saturday, November 28th, 2009
“Arthur Kennedy was never livelier
in carrying a film on his shoulders.”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

Arthur Kennedy was never livelier in carrying a film on his shoulders;
Poverty Row director Edgar G. Ulmer was never more adept at making hay
out of a low-budget film (one of the few he made in Technicolor, and only
his second western; the other being Thunder Over Texas - 1934). This superior
western’s romantic triangle influenced Truffaut’s Jules and Jim, or so
he says. It was hard to tell what influenced him because the situations
are so so different. It was shot in Mexico, but has the look of a studio-bound
film. 

Listen to music for free

While robbing a train of some goods Vicente (Tony Martinez), a long-time
crime partner of Santiago (Arthur Kennedy), is fatally shot. Before he
dies, the frightened Mexican bandito has his amigo act like a priest to
comfort him for the next world. Santiago next stumbles upon poor homesteader
Manuel (Eugene Iglesias), an unsophisticated and proud 20-year-old, who
recently married the pretty but unhappy Maria (Betta St. John). Santiago
flirts with her and she tell him her sad tale that she married Manuel to
escape living as a virtual slave to the evil patrón of the hacienda,
who sold the land to Manuel when he earned the money working for three
years in the States as a migrant farmer. Santiago overpays to get Manuel
to take him by his rundown truck to town, where he sells the stolen goods
to a crooked shipping agent for the railroad, Guntz (Roy Engel), who set
up the robbery. When Guntz tries to cheat him out of his full-share for
the job, Santiago robs his safe and convinces the reluctant but greedy
Manuel to go along with the robbery. Before returning home, the happy-go-lucky
Santiago blows a lot of the money at a bar getting drunk and giving hot
dancer Tina (Charlita) a generous tip to dance for him. The farmer and
the drifter bond further after they get into a brawl with a trio of patrons
trying to take the money they were flashing around. Arriving back at Manuel’s
farm late at night, Manuel acts like a crud to Maria and gets Santiago
angry because he belittles the thief’s wasted life and hypocritically craves
for all of the money to buy livestock for the farm. 

Warning: spoiler to follow in the next paragraph.

In the morning Maria wants to run away with Santiago, and he is unsuccessful
in trying to dissuade her by telling her what a miserable life he really
lives. The tension builds when Guntz and two others come to the farm and
plan to kill Manuel, the only one still at the farm, only to be prevented
by Santiago returning by horse with Maria out of a guilt he has for corrupting
Manuel. This fatalistic tale is about greed, corruption, and the three
flawed characters trapped in situations that are beyond their understanding.
Ulmer’s moralistic story goes way beyond most westerns in exploring character
depth. It ends with the critically wounded Santiago trying to make his
last act in this life an uncharacteristically religious one, as the dying
bandito gives Manuel all the money and his blessing to go far away and
start life over again with Maria.

Topsy-Turvy (1999)

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

Scads a time general artists have longed to create something that they felt was more consequential, more timeless, than the screw up they considered to be less important. This phenomenon is examined in detail in Mike Leigh’s 1999 fog Topsy-Turvy, regarding the troubled artistic partnership of Gilbert & Sullivan.The irony of course comes in when the “fluff” is remembered and the “important” drudgery is completely forgotten.

While one authority suspect at first blush that a biopic of a composer and lyricist of operettas in the 1880’s puissance not be terribly compelling, Leigh has in fact created an excellent portrayal of these two very different creators and their struggles to both follow their own creative bents and to honor their business commitments to turn out a modish show. This primary dilemma is given an additional twist when Sir Arthur Sullivan (Allan Corduner), at the constantly considered the greatest English composer, decides that he wants to write a grand opera. This desire finds expression in his angrily refusing to set William Schwenk Gilbert’s libretti, which he finds increasingly repetitive and ludicrous. These libretti tended to center on some magical contrivance of one kind or another, hence the note to “topsy-turvydom” in the extract above and in the film’s title.

Gilbert (a delightful Jim Broadbent) is naturally annoyed at this superior attitude, and exercising his own ego, refuses to transcribe a different libretto. A chance call by Gilbert, at the urging of his long-suffering wife Lucy (Leslie Manville), to an display of Japanese preoccupation, gives the inspiration for one of the team’s most notable productions, The Mikado. The second half of the film is active with their efforts to get this assembly staged, despite the tons obstacles to such a different opus winning acceptance.

The film does tend to be a little self-indulgent at times; its running time of greater than two and one half hours is not entirely earnest to necessary fabric. For instance, an early scene displays Gilbert’s doddering, half-bananas, whimpering father, who is never seen or heard from again. Ditto conducive to Sullivan’s Parisian womanizing, which goes on far longer than is of the essence to get the illustration. Anyway, the performances by the leads are such a joyousness that it’s distressingly to nit-pick Leigh for including additional scenes. At the selfsame time, the film frustratingly minimizes Gilbert expressing his novel idea to Sullivan and attempting to win him throughout to this innovative subject matter. This would deliver seemed to me to be the point where all of the senior-act maturing was universal, and it mostly happens insane-silver screen.

The garments design (which won an Oscar®) and the production design are first-rate and sumptuous throughout. The perfect compositions are always exciting as are the emendations and arrangements of Gilbert & Sullivan’s distinct compositions, taken largely from Princess Ida and The Sorcerer as well as The Mikado.

The film excels in the scenes between the two principals, but the supporting performances are all capital (with the imaginable exclusion of Charles Simon as Gilbert’s half-dotty father). In persnickety, the backstage jitters and problems of producing a musical comedy are captured vividly and with both sympathy and heart. Anyone who has any sort of love for theater purposefulness be captivated by this twin. And fans of Gilbert & Sullivan at one’s desire also be pleased with the music, for in most cases each song is performed in its entirety.